I was recently passed the November 2009 issue of CAPITAL & CRISIS – investment prospectus along to me mainly because of the following article. With my involvement in the Southern regions of Africa and seeing the affects of foreign investment exceeding foreign aid in Africa for the first time since the 1950s. I believe this article is a timely perspective change for those in the 1st world.
Africa is the world’s greatest emerging market – and over the next decade I believe that this will be proven to be the case… you can either sit back and watch the immense opportunities unfold – or you can get involved and join in the rebuilding and growth of a continent.
The following is an excerpt by Chris Mayer (agorafinancial.com) - November 2009 Capital & Crisis Report:
In horse racing, a match race is when two horses race against each other. One of the most famous such races happened at Pimlico, when Seabiscuit beat War Admiral in November 1938.
In markets, one of the most watched and ongoing match races is the one between emerging (or developing) markets and developed markets. The former include China, India, Brazil and others. The latter include the U.S., the EU and Japan. Which one do we bet on and when?
It’s a particularly good question now as we pick through the still warm ashes of the 2008 bust. Emerging markets have had a hot 10-year run, even if you include the crackup in 2008. In fact, even if you put money in emerging markets on Jan. 1, 2008, your investment was still worth more 18 months later than if you invested in developed markets.
As Jonathan Anderson, a UBS strategist put it, “Not even the worst economic crisis in the postwar era has been able to derail it.” In markets, ideas, like thoroughbreds, run hot and cold. Past performance doesn’t necessarily decide the issue any more than it does in horse racing. But it turns out there is a pretty reliable way to handicap this particular race. This method points to a definite favorite.
For this method, we turn to the aforementioned Mr. Anderson, who wrote about his findings in the Far Eastern Economic Review. His title, “Emerging Markets Poised to Perform,” hints at his conclusion.
In a nutshell, the story goes like this. It all comes down to those old financial constructs called balance sheets. In essence, a balance sheet shows you what you own versus what you owe. These are snapshots in time, a measure of financial health, like an EKG of one’s heart rate. You can spot trouble here before it happens.
Around here, we prefer companies with strong balance sheets – where one owns much and owes little, like owning a house with little or no mortgage. Companies with strong balance sheets have the ability to withstand adversity better than those with weak balance sheets. A strong balance sheet also means that a company can fund its growth independently and more securely than relying on fickle lenders.
This is something 2008 branded painfully on all our psyches. As investing star Martin Whitman wrote in his most recent shareholder letter: “Don’t invest in the common stocks of companies which need relatively continual access to capital markets, especially credit markets… Even the strongest, best-quality issuers can be brought down, or almost brought down, if they continually have to refinance.”
As it turns out, much the same is true with countries. Countries that owe a lot of money tend not to grow as much as those with healthy balance sheets. Anderson created a “stress index” to measure financial health. A country with high debt levels and deficits earns a high stress index score. He then plotted this against a rolling average of GDP growth, a rough measure of economic growth.
So one way to look explain the growth of emerging markets is by looking at their balance sheets. When they have healthy balance sheets, they grow faster than when they have weak balance sheets.
You can see that the last time the emerging markets had a long stretch in the sun was in the 1960s and 1970s. Emerging markets grew 5% or better. As Anderson notes, not a single emerging market – not Africa, not even the Soviet Bloc – failed to post 5% annual growth during this time. And you’ll also note that the balance sheets were healthy.
As a result, emerging markets sailed through the first global oil shock in 1973-75 without much trouble. The developed world, by contrast, suffered the pain of a deep recession. The spoils for investors went to those who struck with their emerging market stocks.
As Anderson says:
Between 1965-1980 the dollar-adjusted return on nascent equity markets in Mexico, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Brazil, South Africa and other lower-income nations ran into the hundreds of percent – while indexes in the U.S. and Europe were essentially flat over the same 15-year period.
Of course, as I say, these things run hot and cold. The emerging markets “imploded” after the 1980-82 recession. A dozen different countries report inflation rates north of 100%. As Anderson points out, 20 currencies lost 50% of their value each year. From 1980-99, emerging markets struggled mightily and barely grew. And as you see from the chart, their balance sheets went south as well.
Emerging market returns during this period were poor overall. A dollar invested in emerging markets in 1990 was worth about a dollar 10 years later. In 2000, though, the game changed again. Emerging markets opened up. They cleaned up their debts. And the emerging markets went on a tear that continues today.
As you can see from the chart, emerging markets still have healthy balance sheets. In fact, they are as strong as they’ve been in 50 years. At some point, that will swing the other way, as these things always do. At some point, there will be too much debt and too much leverage [like we recently saw in 2008 Zimbabwe]. But for now, that seems a ways off.
As Anderson concludes, “All the preconditions are in place for a protracted period of strong economic growth.” He guesses 5-6%, which would crush the developed world.
The developed world suffers through what Richard Koo, the chief economist at Nomura Research in Tokyo, calls a “balance sheet recession.” The Western world suffers from too much debt. That fact shifts the focus from making profits to repaying dedt, according to Koo. This will continue until the West repairs its balance sheets, a process that takes years to correct, as Japan’s long recession shows.
So the same dynamics that make emerging markets look good work in reverse for the developed world. According to Anderson’s model, the stressed balance sheets of the developed world predict slow growth.
As investors, then, we’ll have to continue to look to the emerging markets for growth. That is where the big opportunities will be.
The market never ladles out its rewards evenly, though. To zero down further, the big winner is really Asia and its big markets of China, India and Indonesia. Anderson estimates that these regions could grow 7% or more annually, well above the tepid rates of developed markets and better than most emerging markets. “This is a very hefty gap,” he writes, “and one that is very likely to continue to reward investors who take advantage of the opportunity.”